On Sept. 29, Hobart Pulp, a niche literary magazine, published an interview with me. In it, I took the literary world to task for its identitarian obsessions and performative tokenism. Initially, I received little pushback. Writers in my sphere of Twitter complimented my “heterodox” stances, but the interview received fewer than 100 “likes,” and no more than a dozen retweets—not surprising, given it was more than 10,000 words long and published in a small lit mag frequented by low-level writer types. Still, I considered the interview a success, because it gave me the opportunity to have my say about a culture I was eager to leave behind. I had gotten the bile out of my system and was finally ready to move on with my life as a critic and pundit.

In my mind, I was now officially no longer a member of the literary world—to my relief.

Then, on Oct. 11, I was scrolling on Twitter and noticed I picked up five new followers in quick succession. I hadn’t tweeted in a few hours or published a piece recently, so I thought this was strange. Then five more. Ten. News of the interview, I soon realized, had finally reached the same crew of artless losers I had trashed for 20 pages. I Twitter-searched the interview, and the first hit was from a woman who had found it “very upsetting to read” and “really hurtful on a lot of levels.” And we were off.

“Before long, I was literary public enemy No. 1.”

Get the best of Compact right in your inbox.

Sign up for our free newsletter today.

Great! Check your inbox and click the link.
Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.